日本消費者連盟
すこやかないのちを未来へ
Sound and Healthy Future for Our Children

Protecting Children from Toxic Chemicals

Developmental and other disabilities in children are increasing in Japan, such as ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder), LD (learning disorder) and ASD (autistic spectrum disorder). Infertility is also on the increase and it is becoming harder to have children in the first place. These factors may be due to the effects of toxic chemicals such as food additives, pesticides and additives in plastics and other daily products. Of particular concern to us are environmental hormones (endocrine disruptors), which can lead to intergenerational disorders due to their effects on reproductive functions.

At our General Assembly on 22 June 2024, Consumers Union of Japan will hold a lecture on this special theme, ‘Protecting children from toxic chemicals’, based on our starting point of ‘Linking a healthy life to the future’.

22 June 2024 Symposium: “Protecting children from toxic chemicals – What are the environmental hormones/endocrine disruptors that have adverse effects across generations?”

Date & time: 22 June (Sat), 2024, 13:30-16:00 (doors open 13:00)

Venue: Conference Room 402, 4th Floor, Rengo Kaikan (3-2-11 Kanda Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo)
Access: Shin-Ochanomizu Subway Station, Exit B3; JR Ochanomizu Station (5 mins).

Participation fee: ¥1,000 for general public
Capacity: 70 at the venue

Programme
13:30-13:35 Opening remarks
13:35 – 14:35 “What are environmental hormones/endocrine disruptors such as additives and pesticides in plastics?” Kimura – Junko Kuroda, Vice-President, Environmental Neuroscience Information Centre
14:35 – 15:05 “How to live to protect children from dangerous chemicals” Satoko Kami, Representative, Parents’ Association for Children’s Environment
15:05 – 15:15 Break
15:15 – 15:55 “What we can and should do now for future generations” Kimura – Junko Kuroda and Satoko Kami (Talk session)
15:55 – 16:00 Closing remarks

Do sign up to our English newsletter, Japan Resources, or even better please become a member, and get our monthly Japanese magazine, Shouhisha Report.

GMO or Not? Open letter of enquiry on red yeast rice food products

3 April 2024

To: Ms Nanako Jimi, Minister of State for Consumer Affairs and Food Safety

Ms Yutaka Arai, Commissioner for Consumer Affairs

Consumers Union of Japan

Open letter of enquiry on red yeast rice food products

Kobayashi Pharmaceutical’s products made from red yeast rice, have caused health problems for many users, and we believe that this incident highlights the problems with functional foods and genetic manipulation (GMO). Is it GMO or not? We request a review of food administration based on the lessons learned from the red yeast rice malt incident, and request answers to the following questions. We would appreciate your answers in writing by 19 April 2024 . We will publish these questions and answers.

Notes.

1, Regarding the functional food labelling system

There is no end to the number of health problems caused by Japan’s so-called functional food labelling system, under which labelling is permitted by notification by business operators, even when there is no peer-reviewed scientific evidence of functionality and safety that has been published.

(1) Does your agency have an understanding of how the number of health problems caused by the consumption of health foods (including supplements) has changed since the functional food labelling system was launched?

(2) Your Agency seems to be asking businesses that sell functional foods to gather information on health damage, but does your Agency keep track of such information? If so, shouldn’t the information be made public in order to prevent accidents like this one?

(3) We believe that what consumers need to improve their health is a nutritionally balanced diet, and that health foods are not that necessary. Also, do you think that functional foods help consumers to improve their health? Please answer by providing evidence for this.

(4) We believe that functional foods that cause health damage should be abolished, but how do you sum up this system? Are you considering a fundamental review?

2, Safety confirmation and labelling related to genetic manipulation of food products

There is information that Kobayashi Pharmaceutical improved the productivity of red yeast rice by exposing it to strong ultraviolet light, but there is a possibility that the genes of the fungus were damaged by the ultraviolet light. The company is also seeking technology involving genome editing in the improvement of red yeast rice in 2020, and it is possible that it was created through genome editing.

It is reported that puberulic acid has been detected, but as blue mould and red yeast belong to the same family, it is not impossible that red yeast may have carried a similar gene that led to its production by mutation. We have long been concerned that genetic modification (GMO) can cause unexpected changes in genes, leading to the production of toxic substances. We therefore ask the following questions.

(1) Do you know what kind of manipulation or processing method was used to produce the strain of red yeast rice in question? If so, please disclose this information as soon as possible.

(2) Is genome editing of micro-organisms used as food ingredients subject to notification to the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare? Is your Agency aware of the existence of genome editing in the relevant red yeast strains?

(3) Since genetic engineering cannot eliminate the possibility of producing harmful substances due to unintended genetic changes, we believe that safety confirmation (whole genome analysis and animal experiments) and labelling should be mandatory for all genetically engineered foods.

Enquiry on Red Rice Yeast Foods

To: Kobayashi Pharmaceutical, Co., Ltd.

Consumers Union of Japan (NPO)

Open letter: Is it GMO or not?

Your products made from beni kouji red rice yeast have caused health problems for many users, and we believe that this incident highlights the problems with functional foods and genetic modification (GMO). We are concerned that GMO can cause unexpected genetic changes, leading to the production of harmful substances. We therefore invite you to respond to the following questions. We would appreciate your answers in writing by 19 April. We will publish these questions and answers.

NOTES.

1. We have information that your company’s red rice yeast is exposed to strong ultraviolet light to improve its productivity, but have you investigated the genetic changes caused by UV treatment?

2, Your company was calling for technology proposals in 2020 that include genome editing of filamentous fungi and actinomycetes such as red yeast rice. Has your company adopted genome editing technology as a result? If so, which genes have you modified?

3, Your company has reported that your red rice yeast has no citrinin production capacity, but have you investigated the production capacity of other mould poisons, etc.?

4, You say that puberulic acid was detected in the product, but did you investigate in advance whether the strain of red yeast rice owned by your company has the ability to produce puberulic acid?

5. With regard to the health hazards caused by red rice yeast, please explain why it took a considerable amount of time from the time you became aware of the incident to the announcement and response. This ultimately led to an increase in damage to consumers. What do you think of the responsibility for this? Also, will you continue to produce and sell functional foods and other health foods in the future?

6. We believe that what consumers need to improve their health is a nutritionally balanced diet and that health foods are not necessary, but what are your views on this?

Japanese Open Letter here

CNN: Japan recalls ‘red rice’ health products over suspected link to five deaths

The Guardian: Japan dietary supplement recalled amid investigation into two deaths and 100 hospitalisations

Taipei Times: Japanese red yeast rice supplements recalled over kidney risk

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Mitsubishi Electric: Withdraw from Arms Exports

On 21 March, three organisations – Consumers Union of Japan, the Housewives’ Federation and the Network Against Arms Trade (NAJAT) – held a protest action calling on Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Mitsubishi Electric to withdraw from arms production and exports. This is part of the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Mitsubishi Electric must withdraw from arms production and exports! Postcard Action, which started on 20 March.

Citizens gathered at the protest in front of the company, calling on MHI to withdraw from arms exports and international joint development and to withdraw from the production of enemy base attack missiles and the joint development of next-generation fighter aircraft! The letter of request was handed to both companies.

Letter of request to Mitsubishi Electric

Letter of request to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

After the protest in front of the company, a press conference on the postcard action was held. The protest and the press conference can be viewed below. Filming was made possible by citizen media broadcaster UPLAN.

Japan Resources 192

Please click here for our latest English newsletter (pdf): JR 192

Contents:

From the Editors: The Future of Food in 2024

The First CRISPR Tomatoes Now on the Shelves in Japan

Clinical test of eggs produced by genome-edited chickens selected as AMED research project

Shizuoka Prefectural Assembly Passes Resolution Calling for Genome-edited Food Labeling

Report from UPOV Workshop

Statement: Calling for an Immediate Halt to Armed Action in Israel and Palestine

From the Editors:

The Future of Food in 2024

Consumers Union of Japan and other organizations started the campaign against genetically modified food in 1996, and fought hard for labelling rules as well as local production without GMOs here in Japan.

However, the first wave of genome-edited foods have now reached supermarket shelves in 2024. We are concerned about the safety but also the effects on biological diversity. At the same time, rules for “plant variety protection” under UPOV seem to bring massive benefits for a few corporations, with no concern for farmers or consumers. How about the future?

Stay tuned to our campaigns and join us as we keep up the good work…

– Editors