日本消費者連盟
すこやかないのちを未来へ
Sound and Healthy Future for Our Children

Japan Resources – 184

Please click here for our latest English newsletter: JR 184

Contents:

From the Editors: Legal Issues

Group Lawsuit Filed Against TEPCO by Young People with Thyroid Cancer

Public Hearing on Genome-Edited Foods in Japan

Status of Genome-Edited Fish and Consumers Union of Japan (CUJ) Activities

Opinion on the Japanese Government’s Draft Guidelines on Non-use Labeling of Food Additives

From the Editors: Legal Issues

Welcome to issue No. 184 of Consumers Union of Japan’s English newsletter. This time we focus on recent legal developments including the first group lawsuit by people diagnosed with thyroid cancer after the tragic nuclear accident in Fukushima. Already, eleven years have passed and the suffering is on-going.

We also highlight the issue of genome-edited foods (which are not regulated) as well as efforts by the Japanese government regarding popular food labels that indicate that food does not contain artificial additives. Believe it or not, but the Japanese government wants to make such important information illegal.

We hope you will stay updated with CUJ’s activities and news on our English website, as well as on our new English Twitter account: https://twitter.com/consumerunionjp/

Public Hearing on Genome-Edited Foods in Japan

Today, Consumers Union of Japan and our campaign against genetically modified foods, the No! GMO Campaign, which began in 1996, is participating in a public hearing in the Japanese Parliament about the status of genome-edited foods. We are concerned about the current trend to bypass legislation to introduce untested genome-edited fish and other foods. Also, we are outraged that there is no food labelling for these products, which further undermines consumers’ trust in novel applications of GMOs. We will present signatures in support of our petition campaign to label all seeds and seedlings of genome-edited foods to the relevant ministries of the Japanese government at the public hearing.

Here is a brief update on the current trend and our activities:

Status of Genome Edited Fish and Consumers Union of Japan (CUJ) Activities

February 8 2022

(1) About the genome-edited mackerel developed by Kyushu University

Using a novel genetic engineering technique known as TALEN, rather than CRISPR/Cas9, Kyushu University is developing a genome-edited mackerel with reduced aggression. Kyushu University has overcome the obstacle of genome editing of mackerel, a non-model organism that is difficult to handle, and established a mutant strain. According to Kyushu University, it has been confirmed that aggression has been reduced and breeding efficiency has been improved. They claim that a comprehensive phenotypic analysis of the meat quality and growth rate is scheduled to be conducted after this spring, and the usefulness of the product will be evaluated.

When CUJ sent a letter of inquiry about this genome-edited mackerel to the research group at Kyushu University in March last year, they replied that they would obtain the base sequence information of the entire genome and that they plan to conduct food safety tests through animal experiments. (If you have further questions please contact us.)

(2) Miyazu City, Kyoto Prefecture, Offers Genome-edited Tiger Puffer Fish as a Hometown Tax Return Gift

In Japan, there is a system called “Furusato (home town) tax refund gift” that allows people to make donations to local governments that they want to support. You do not have to be from a specific hometown or a resident to make a donation. In addition to getting a tax refund or deduction, donations made through the Furusato tax system are popular because the local government provides you with special products and accommodation vouchers as a thank-you gift. On January 31, we sent a letter to Miyazu City, Kyoto Prefecture, asking them to stop providing genome-edited tiger puffer fish as a thank-you gift for Furusato taxpayers. Currently, we are calling on citizens all over Japan via social networking sites to raise their voices to ask Miyazu City to stop offering genome-edited tiger puffer fish as a Furusato tax refund gift.

(3) Responses From Conveyor-belt Sushi Chains

CUJ sent a questionnaire to 18 food companies, including conveyor-belt sushi chains, if they would handle genome-edited fish. Six companies responded. Of the six companies, three responded that they do not use genome-edited fish, and one responded that they do not plan to use it at this time, but have not decided on a policy. One company responded, “We do not plan to use it at this time, but have not decided our policy.” The conveyor-belt sushi chain that announced the joint development of genome-edited fish responded, “At this time, we have not established a clear policy, so we refrain from answering.”

However, some reports have suggested that the company will consider using genome edited fish within the group or selling it to outside parties, so we think this is an extremely problematic response from the company.

Food Additives: Consumers Have a Right to Know and Choose

Opinion on the Japanese Government’s Draft Guidelines on Non-use Labeling of Food Additives

Consumers Union of Japan (CUJ) is opposed to the “Draft Guidelines on the Non-use Labeling of Food Additives.”

Consumers are demanding foods with fewer food additives. However, due to the inadequacy of the current food additive labeling system, it is difficult to avoid food additives even if one wants to avoid eating them as much as possible. On the other hand, some companies are making efforts to produce and provide foods without additives as much as possible to respond to consumers’ voices, which is why they label their products as “additive-free” (無添加 mutenka) as well as non-use. It is admitted that there are some inappropriate labels, but one problem is that the labeling principle of listing the names of substances in order of weight is not being followed. Therefore, we would like to request the government to discuss the establishment of a food labeling system that protects consumers’ right to know and choose, rather than to formulate guidelines in a hasty manner.

(1) It is the consumer’s right to know the non-use of food additives
For consumers who seek foods with less food additives, non-use labeling is information that contributes to product selection.

(2) Guidelines that are vague and susceptible to broad interpretation are harmful
Many of the definitions of the proposed categories are vague and unfounded, and may be interpreted broadly, which may practically lead to the prohibition of all additive-free and non-use labeling. Such a situation is not what consumers want.

(3) Food additives should be discussed based on the precautionary principle, not as something safe
The guidelines are based on the assumption that food additives are safe if they are below the ADI (Acceptable Daily Intake) set by the Food Safety Commission, but the current evaluation method has its limitations. In addition to properly acknowledging these limitations, the government should instruct businesses to reduce food additives in accordance with the precautionary principle, and labeling should be able to convey the reduction of food additives.

(4) Improvement of food additive labeling system should be reconsidered from consumers’ point of view
In the recent debate on the review of food labeling, only the opinions of the industry have been respected, and the inadequate labeling system has not been improved, but it has become a setback for consumers. We strongly request that the review panel should be fundamentally reviewed and the food additive labeling system should be re-examined based on the opinions of consumers.

Japan Resources – 183

Please click here for our latest English newsletter: JR 183

Special focus on energy

Contents:

From the Editors: Energetic Japan

Nuclear Power in Japan, 10 Years after the Fukushima Disaster

CUJ Opinions on the Draft Basic Energy Plan

Will genome edited food be labelled in Japan?

Another Citizens’ Food Summit: The “Green Food System Strategy” proposed by MAFF is not that “Green”

Trend: The 2nd National Nanohana Blossom Summit in Oyama was held in Oyama, Tochigi Prefecture, on 11-12 December 2021

From the Editors:

Energetic Japan

Welcome to issue No. 183 of Consumers Union of Japan’s English newsletter. This time, the theme is energy, a topic that is always timely in resource-poor Japan.

We note that 10 years after the massive earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disaster in 2011, only 10 nuclear reactors have been restarted. Consumers Union of Japan is proposing another way forward, with our motto, local production for local consumption.

We hope you will stay updated with CUJ’s activities and news on our English website, as well as on our new English Twitter account: https://twitter.com/consumerunionjp/

Trend: Organic, Pesticide-free School Lunches in Japan

The 2nd National Nanohana Blossom Summit was held in Oyama, Tochigi Prefecture, on 11-12 December 2021

By Tasaka Koa

This conference was attended by the mayor of Oyama, the mayor of Isumi, and the mayor of Kisarazu, as well as Mr. Sameda Susumu, a city official who has been promoting organic school lunches in Isumi. They discussed the promotion of organic farming, protection of natural monuments such as the crested ibis, and preservation of the environment.

Isumi in Chiba Prefecture has been promoting the use of locally grown organic and pesticide-free rice and vegetables for school lunches instead of imported wheat bread contaminated with pesticides. It is a city that has decided to supply organic and pesticide-free rice for school lunches at all of its elementary and junior high schools, under the guidance of the late Mr. Inaba of a local rice research institute. They achieved the goal of supplying organic and pesticide-free rice for school lunches in all elementary and junior high schools in Isumi by 2019, as well as eight kinds of vegetables grown organically and pesticide-free to be served at school lunches.

Next, it was reported that Kisarazu in Chiba Prefecture is currently implementing a special program for farmers to produce organic and pesticide-free rice and vegetables to serve as school lunches for elementary and junior high schools in Kisarazu.

Based on these reports, the mayor of Oyama in Tochigi Prefecture decided to do the same in Oyama and convert school lunches to organic, pesticide-free foods. To this end, the Oyama City Organic Agriculture Council was established and a local rice research institute in Tochigi Prefecture was assigned to provide technical guidance to organic rice growers.

https://mapitdata.blob.core.windows.net/map02-png/en/plum/%E5%8D%83%E8%91%89%E7%9C%8C(%E5%B8%82%E7%94%BA%E6%9D%91).png